Faith vs. Honesty

Where does telling a lie and having faith without indisputable proof border each other? Is it wrong of me to imply ‘indisputable proof’ requires using one of the 5 senses instead of including spiritual responses? What part of society has led us to believe that saying something is true without physical knowledge (i.e. relying on spiritual impressions) is wrong and falsifiable? When does that perspective enter a child’s mind, and how best do you teach them the correct way of living (i.e. living by faith)?

Some of my initial reflections:
The law requires proof that is indisputable (as far as a judge or jury will believe), therefore something that is logical or something that someone can resense through the 5 senses without any additional effort on their part. Spiritual proofs can be felt by anyone as well, but they require effort to experience and therefore a choice to act or believe by the one disputing the experience. This is useless in law since you are trying to prove a fact (whether of the 5 senses or a spiritual impression) that the opponent does not want to find out is true. The opponent will not put forward the effort (i.e. faith) to find out for themself if the spiritual confirmation was a legitamate experience. And logic formed from spiritual evidences has the same hindrance since it takes a belief in spiritual influences to follow the explanation of a logical proof of spiritual things.

That responds to one of my questions from above. But, what about the others?

Leave a comment

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: